Thursday, 30 May 2019
Wednesday, 22 May 2019
What are the defects in welding?
The
lack of training to the operator or careless application of welding
technologies causes discontinuities in welding. Infusion welding,
defects such as porosity, slag inclusion, solidification cracks etc.,
deteriorates the weld quality and joint properties. Common weld
defects found in welded joints:
These mistakes may result in
sudden crashes which are unexpected as they give rise to stress
intensities. The common weld defects include:-
i. Porosity
ii. Lack
of fusion
iii. Inclusions
iv. Cracking
v. Undercut
vi.Lamellar tearing
i. Porosity
Porosity
takes place when the solidifying weld metal has gases trapped in it.
The presence of porosity in most off the welded joints is due to dirt
on the surface of the metal to be welded or damp consumables.
ii. Lack of
Fusion
Due to very little input or slow traverse of the
welding torch, lack of fusion arises. A better weld can be obtained
by increasing the temperature, by properly cleaning the weld surface
before welding and by choosing the proper joint design and
electrodes, a better. On extending the fusion zone to the thickness
of the joints fully, a great quality joint can be achieved.
iii.
Inclusions
Due to the trapping of the oxides, fluxes
and electrode coating materials in the weld zone, the inclusions
have occurred. Inclusions are caused while joining the thick plates
in several runs using flux cored or flux coated rods and the slag
covering a run is not completely removed after each run and before
the next run starts. By maintaining a clean surface before the run is
started, providing sufficient space for the molten weld metal
between the pieces to be joined, the inclusions can
be prevented.
iv. Cracking
Due to the strain
at the time of phase change, cracks may occur in various directions
and in various locations in the weld area. Due to poor design and
improper procedure of joining high residual stresses, cracking is
seen. A stage-wise pre-heating process and stage-wise slow cooling
will prevent such type of cracks.
v. The undercut
The undercut is caused due to incorrect settings or using improper
procedure. Undercutting can be detected by a naked eye and the excess
penetration can be visually detected.
vi. Lamellar
Tearing
Due to non-metallic inclusions, the lamellar
tearing occurs through the thickness direction. This is more
evidently found in rolled plates. As the fusion boundary is parallel
to the rolling plane in T and corner joints, the lamellar tearing
occurs. By redesigning the joint and by covering the weld area with
ductile material, the lamellar tearing can be minimized.
Monday, 13 May 2019
Visual Inspection
The structure of the visual inspection process is one of the most important features that influence its
effectiveness. From the work process perspective visual inspection consists of several stages:
• visual “screening”/search for potential defects
• finding a defect (“detection”)
• defect classification
• a decision
that classifies a component, product or service. Each of the stages has an impact on the effectiveness of inspection. The first stage, when an object is visually examined by a man, requires vigilance, heightened the sense of sight to detect potential errors. In the first and second stage of inspection, when the level of inspector’s perception is of particular significance, appropriate working conditions and inspector’s knowledge about potential defects are absolutely required. In the third stage, based on his knowledge about the defects and classification criteria, the inspector makes the decision on the type of defect detected in the product. In the final part of the inspection process, the inspector decides if the product may be forwarded to further steps of the process, or if it should be separated from good quality products. Two of the four stages mentioned above (searching for defects and decision-making) seem to be of particular importance from the point of view of visual control. It turns out that they are most exposed to decision variability of the operators. In the inspection process, they may make two types of errors classify a good quality product as defective (FALS) and classify a defective product as good The likelihood of committing these two types of errors and the fraction of products that do not conform with requirements after the inspection process are the key indicators of inspection efficiency. There are many factors that affect the efficiency of visual inspection. Making the decision concerning the quality of inspected products requires not only specific knowledge of the industry but often also an individual approach to every inspected product and high sensitivity to defects. Relevant research shows that the efficiency of visual inspection is affected by independent factors and factors related to and dependent on man. These two main groups of factors can be divided into five categories, Technical factors are associated with the physical execution of visual inspection in the production process. They include, for example, factors related to the actual quality level, product features subject to inspection (their accessibility for visual inspection), to the standards, based on which the product is controlled, the availability of tools used during the inspection, etc. Psychophysical factors are associated with mental and physical conditions of inspectors. These include age, sex, intelligence, temperament, health condition etc. Research in this area aims at identifying the characteristics comprising the profile of the ideal inspector. The next group of factors affecting the effectiveness of visual inspection are organizational factors. These include support in decision-making during the inspection, acquiring inspector skills, number and type of inspections, information on efficiency and accuracy of conducted inspections, as well as stress factors influencing the inspector, such as time, consequences of incorrect assessment (no bonus, loss of company image, etc.). Workplace environment conditions are associated with the workplace, where the inspection takes place. Light, noise, temperature, as well as the organization of the workstation itself, come under this The last group is related to the social environment, where inspectors work. The work often involves pressure from people, whose interest is contrary to the inspector’s work. For example, production staff (often colleagues) exert pressure expecting approval of their work (which is related to the payment of salaries, bonuses). In turn, employees of the management board may exert pressure to minimize reinspections of products with an unambiguous assessment.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)